<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Professor Tree Frog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Science, Sarcasm and Sensibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Too Big To Fail, Too Big To Exist&#8221; Act by ProfessorTreeFrog</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/the-too-big-to-fail-too-big-to-exist-act/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorTreeFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=395#comment-74</guid>
		<description>No, not as a bill on its own. It&#039;s too simple. Maybe they can stick it in as a rider on a defense-funding bill. Those always pass. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not as a bill on its own. It&#8217;s too simple. Maybe they can stick it in as a rider on a defense-funding bill. Those always pass. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Too Big To Fail, Too Big To Exist&#8221; Act by Ben Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/the-too-big-to-fail-too-big-to-exist-act/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=395#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Great bill but I don&#039;t give it much chance of passing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great bill but I don&#8217;t give it much chance of passing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I&#8217;m a Democrat by thoughtbasket</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/why-im-a-democrat/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>thoughtbasket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=374#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Right on, Tree Frog! You picked good ones, and I like how you described them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Tree Frog! You picked good ones, and I like how you described them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nifty New Fossils Clarify Evolution of Pterosaurs, Hominids by Janet Storms</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/nifty-new-fossils-clarify-evolution-of-pterosaurs-hominids/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Storms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=337#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Ayn Rand challenges a creationist who thinks Ardipithecus disproves evolution.
http://02e56fa.netsolhost.com/blog1/index.php/2009/10/01/ayn-rand-refutes-creationist-who-claims-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayn Rand challenges a creationist who thinks Ardipithecus disproves evolution.<br />
<a href="http://02e56fa.netsolhost.com/blog1/index.php/2009/10/01/ayn-rand-refutes-creationist-who-claims-" rel="nofollow">http://02e56fa.netsolhost.com/blog1/index.php/2009/10/01/ayn-rand-refutes-creationist-who-claims-</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A History of &#8220;In-Progress&#8221; Peace Prizes by ProfessorTreeFrog</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/a-history-of-in-progress-peace-prizes/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorTreeFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 06:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=285#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I agree with basically everything you just said. I can only assume the gasping Norwegians agree with us too... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with basically everything you just said. I can only assume the gasping Norwegians agree with us too&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A History of &#8220;In-Progress&#8221; Peace Prizes by Johnny M</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/a-history-of-in-progress-peace-prizes/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=285#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I saw Rachel&#039;s show last night and she went way overboard defending the award - it reminded me of something Hannity would do if a Republican received the award.  First, she never mentioned the people she said were getting the award for in-progress peace efforts (Tutu, Carter, for example) had received the award for DECADES of service, not 1 year.  Then when defending his record over the past year, all she was able to show were speeches that Obama has given.  No actual achievements or policies to promote his grand vision of the what the world should be.

The award was nothing short of premature; not Obama&#039;s fault, but just takes away from the prestige the Nobel committee believes it has built</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Rachel&#8217;s show last night and she went way overboard defending the award &#8211; it reminded me of something Hannity would do if a Republican received the award.  First, she never mentioned the people she said were getting the award for in-progress peace efforts (Tutu, Carter, for example) had received the award for DECADES of service, not 1 year.  Then when defending his record over the past year, all she was able to show were speeches that Obama has given.  No actual achievements or policies to promote his grand vision of the what the world should be.</p>
<p>The award was nothing short of premature; not Obama&#8217;s fault, but just takes away from the prestige the Nobel committee believes it has built</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans Support the Public Option!?!? by ProfessorTreeFrog</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/republicans-support-the-public-option/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorTreeFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=251#comment-60</guid>
		<description>It just goes to show that GOP lawmakers aren&#039;t representing the &quot;people&quot; they so often cite in their populist umbrage - members of their own party don&#039;t even agree with what they&#039;re doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just goes to show that GOP lawmakers aren&#8217;t representing the &#8220;people&#8221; they so often cite in their populist umbrage &#8211; members of their own party don&#8217;t even agree with what they&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans Support the Public Option!?!? by Ben Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/republicans-support-the-public-option/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=251#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Doubtfully. The Republicans cater to the lunatic fringe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doubtfully. The Republicans cater to the lunatic fringe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gay Marriage IS a Defense of Marriage Act!! by adhominy</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/gay-marriage-is-a-defense-of-marriage-act/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>adhominy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=201#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Oh, that is beautiful. I would love to see a cite for my blog! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that is beautiful. I would love to see a cite for my blog! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maine Joins the Club, is NH next? by Xyren</title>
		<link>http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/maine-joins-the-club-is-nh-next/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Xyren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://professortreefrog.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on the graduation!  I&#039;m doing the same in a week from Friday.  ^_^

I&#039;m really happy that gay marriage is becoming legalized in more states.  Sad, though, that my own solidly blue state isn&#039;t one of them (and IMO won&#039;t be for some time, grrr).  In a lot of ways, I think gay marriage is healthy for society (equality, sure, but I&#039;m thinking economically; benefits all around there).  I also think, and hope, gay marriage will be beneficial to the rather, well, promiscuous gay culture too.  It&#039;s my hope that younger gays who are able to grow up knowing marriage is possible will be more inclined to seek a more steady and traditional relationship as opposed to the random club-hopping (guy hopping!) that I feel is happening now.

Even so, my idealistic prudish views aside, I am still concerned about the potential outcome if these new laws go before the Supreme Court (and half the time, even before the people in the form of referendums and propositions, grrr Prop 8).  They&#039;re the only &quot;old guard&quot; that matters at this point, and while they&#039;ve recently been gay friendly, I&#039;m still not certain that they&#039;re all willing to go so far as to allow the progress of gay marriage to continue as it has been.  While it&#039;s likely that they&#039;d approve - and likelier still that they&#039;d neither approve nor disapprove but instead let the states themselves determine - the possibility exists that they&#039;ll say no and strike it all down in one fell swoop.  That scares me.  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on the graduation!  I&#8217;m doing the same in a week from Friday.  ^_^</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really happy that gay marriage is becoming legalized in more states.  Sad, though, that my own solidly blue state isn&#8217;t one of them (and IMO won&#8217;t be for some time, grrr).  In a lot of ways, I think gay marriage is healthy for society (equality, sure, but I&#8217;m thinking economically; benefits all around there).  I also think, and hope, gay marriage will be beneficial to the rather, well, promiscuous gay culture too.  It&#8217;s my hope that younger gays who are able to grow up knowing marriage is possible will be more inclined to seek a more steady and traditional relationship as opposed to the random club-hopping (guy hopping!) that I feel is happening now.</p>
<p>Even so, my idealistic prudish views aside, I am still concerned about the potential outcome if these new laws go before the Supreme Court (and half the time, even before the people in the form of referendums and propositions, grrr Prop 8).  They&#8217;re the only &#8220;old guard&#8221; that matters at this point, and while they&#8217;ve recently been gay friendly, I&#8217;m still not certain that they&#8217;re all willing to go so far as to allow the progress of gay marriage to continue as it has been.  While it&#8217;s likely that they&#8217;d approve &#8211; and likelier still that they&#8217;d neither approve nor disapprove but instead let the states themselves determine &#8211; the possibility exists that they&#8217;ll say no and strike it all down in one fell swoop.  That scares me.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
